Blog / In the Community

Off-Label Drug Use – Are You Informed?

drug test

Last October, we highlighted the Huffington Post’s series regarding Johnson & Johnson's drug Risperdal and the billions of dollars the company made whilst failing to warn prospective patients, particularly young males, about the risk of developing breasts. . In that article, we touched upon the concept of “off-label” drug use, a hot topic recently addressed by the Wall Street Journal, in an article entitled, “Risk of Off-Label Uses for Prescription Drugs.”

The timing of the article could not have been better as the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California is prepared to hear arguments in U.S. ex rel. Solis v. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as to whether the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has the authority to limit the pharmaceutical industry’s right to free speech in “truthfully” marketing its products. Recall that a pharmaceutical company is not permitted to market its product off-label, an unlawful activity that has cost some pharmaceutical manufacturers hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars.

The Wall Street Journal’s article was premised upon a recent study spearheaded by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine (JAMA), entitled “Off-Label Drug Use and Adverse Drug Events Turning up the Heat on Off-Label Prescribing.” 

The study was done, in part, because of concerns regarding adverse drug events (ADEs), and that no systematic investigation of the effects of off-label drug use in adult population had been performed to date. This is quite remarkable considering the fact that, according to the study, a significant proportion of drugs doctors prescribe (approximately 12 percent) are for uses other than those approved by the FDA.

In order to fully appreciate the magnitude of the study, on must understand the concept of off-label drug use, which is the practice of prescribing medications for indications, or using a dosage or dosage form, that have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Surprisingly, FDA has no specific regulation addressing off-label drug use, but it did issue a notice of proposed rule-making in 1972 that provides insight into the agency’s analysis:

Once new drug is in a local pharmacy after interstate shipment, the physician may, as part of the practice of medicine, lawfully prescribe a different dosage for his patient, or may otherwise vary the conditions of use from those approved in the package insert, without informing or obtaining the approval of the Food and Drug Administration. This interpretation of the Act is consistent with Congressional intent as indicated in the legislative history of the 1938 Act and the drug amendments of 1962. Throughout the debate leading to the enactment, there were repeated statements that Congress did not intend the Food and Drug Administration to interfere with medical practice and references to the understanding that the bill did not purport to regulate the practice of medicine as between the physician and the patient. Congress recognized a patient's right to seek civil damages in the courts if there should be evidence of malpractice, and declined to provide any legislative restrictions upon the medical profession. 

In 1981, the above proposed rule was cited by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the case of The United States v. H. Ray Evers, M.D. In that case, the FDA sued Dr. Evans for “misbranding” a drug in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“Act”). More specifically, Dr. Evers had been utilizing “chelation” drugs, which were FDA approved for the treatment of heavy metal poisoning, to treat circulatory disorders. Interestingly, prior to bringing suit, the FDA explicitly informed Dr. Evers that he could legally prescribe chelating drugs for the treatment of circulatory disorders. Moreover, during litigation, the United States agreed with Dr. Evers that the provisions of the Act and the FDA regulations did not prevent him from prescribing chelation drugs off-label. Instead, the United States took issue with Dr. Evers promotional activities associated with his off-label drug use. Ultimately, the US Court of Appeals found in favor of Dr. Evers because he was not promoting the use of chelation drugs to other physicians, but only to his patients.

In many cases, off-label drug use can be beneficial. For instance, if a doctor has a patient with a diagnosis of major depression disorder with psychotic features, then in that instance, a doctor may have a reasonable basis to treat his/her patient with an "off-label" medication such as Risperdal, which is only FDA approved to treat schizophrenia or bi-polar disease. While the patient does not have the diagnosis of schizophrenia or bi-polar disease, the patient does suffer from psychosis, for which there are no FDA approved drugs on the market to treat. Thus, a physician may be justified in prescribing the drug off label, provided that the patient has been fully informed about the risks of that medication. However, should the patient begin to suffer from an adverse effect associated with the drug, the risk-benefit profile for that patient should be reassessed.

This philosophy is supported by the JAMA article/study cited above, which has demonstrated that off-label use that lacked strong scientific evidence had a higher ADE rate (21.7 per 10,000 person-months) compared with on-label use and off-label use with strong scientific evidence (13.2 per 10,000 person-months) had about the same risk for ADEs as on-label use. Furthermore, the risk for ADEs grew as the number of prescription drugs the patient used increased. For example, patients using eight or more drugs had more than a five-fold increased risk for ADEs compared with patients who used one to two drugs. The authors of the study concluded that "Off-label drug use, and particularly off-label use without strong scientific evidence, is a risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs). Hence, physicians and physician organizations should recognize the enormity of the problem and be active participants in the promotion of cautious prescribing of drugs for off-label uses lacking strong scientific evidence. Future electronic health records (EHRs) should be designed to enable post-marketing surveillance of treatment indications and treatment outcomes to monitor the safety of on- and off-label uses of drugs." In a related commentary, Chester B. Good, M.D., M.P.H., and Walid F. Gellad, M.D., M.P.H., of the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, write: "Egulae and colleagues have provided compelling evidence that off-label prescribing is frequently inappropriate and that prescribing in these circumstances increases the risk for an adverse event substantially. The FDA and the courts must carefully consider these findings as they contemplate guidance that would relax regulations to permit promotion of drugs beyond their labeled indications."

Consumers beware – many drugs being prescribed off-label today carry significant FDA warnings, some of which caution the user that the drug may substantially increase the risk of death and/or serious bodily injury in some patient sub-populations. Therefore, before taking a medication, one should consider investigating the medication in detail to determine if the benefit outweighs the risk. At a minimum, your research should identify the signs and symptoms of adverse reactions associated with the medication, in order to timely trigger reassessment of the need for the drug.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Two kids out trick-or-treating at night

No Boo-Boos! Keeping Everyone Safe This Halloween

It’s October! The scary season! A month of haunts, costumes, and candy, all leading up to the most chillingly fun holiday of the year: Halloween! Whether you’re a parent of kids who will be trick-or-treating or a homeowner handing out treats to the goblins who ring your doorbell, Halloween is a wonderful example of a holiday that’s fun for the adults as well as the kids. We hate to dampen the mood, but you need to be aware that Halloween can be legitimately scary for parents—and not the good kind of scary. Research by the Journal of the American Medical Association found that the risk of pedestrian fatalities is 43 percent greater on Halloween night than any other night of the year. The only things that should be scary this month are the costumes and the haunted houses! That’s why Halloween safety, whether your kids are trick-or-treating in Wheeling, Moundsville, St. Clairsville, or anywhere else in the Ohio Valley and southwest Pennsylvania, is so important. Here are some tips for keeping kids safe on Halloween. Safe Trick-or-Treating Most trick-or-treating occurs during twilight (sunset in Wheeling on Oct. 31 is around 6:20 p.m.) or early darkness. Although it won’t matter as much when Halloween falls on a weekend, rush hour at this time puts more cars on the road. Even when parents are accompanying their kids trick-or-treating, crossing streets and walking along roads that don’t have sidewalks increases the risk of something tragic happening. But that shouldn’t stop your family from trick-or-treating. Here are some things you can do to keep you and your kids safe on Halloween (or whichever day your town is scheduling trick-or-treating): Give flashlights to your kids to carry as they cross streets or walk along roads. Don’t rely on the lights on smartphones to be visible—they aren’t designed to make you visible. Small handheld flashlights can be easily pointed and are more easily seen by drivers. (Plus, if you stand on the sidewalk while your kids go to a door to get candy, you can shine your flashlight in their faces to remind them to say “thank you” if they forget …) Be extra visible by adding reflective strips to your kids’ costumes and giving them glow sticks to wear around their necks or wrists. Cross at crosswalks instead of the middle of the block. It’s tempting for kids to run back and forth across the street to go to a house where they see lights on, but drivers might not be as vigilant for pedestrians away from the corners, especially if kids are darting out behind parked cars. Encourage your kids to take off masks when walking along roads. You don’t want to take away from their great costumes, but masks can limit peripheral vision, which isn’t good when walking next to traffic. They can always put the mask back on when they ring the doorbell to sufficiently impress homeowners! Similarly, be extra aware if your child’s costume restricts any movement, such as a dress on a princess (and every year, there are plenty of princesses!) or a cloak on a Grim Reaper. Even without traffic, tripping over a curb can hurt—and Halloween is not the night you want to go to the emergency room. Remind them to watch their step and not run. Hold your kids’ smartphones so they aren’t tempted to be checking them while walking along roads and crossing streets. This advice extends to parents: Keep your phone in your pocket, only taking it out when you’re away from traffic. Take plenty of pictures—just when it is safe to do so. Older kids might want to trick-or-treat on their own, which is understandable, because what middle schooler wants their parents with them on Halloween? Reinforce all the Halloween safety rules already mentioned, and add a few: Give them a curfew to be back home. The later Halloween gets, say after 8 p.m., the fewer commuters on the roads, replaced by less careful teenagers and college students. Provide a firm curfew, and even offer to let their friends come over and watch a scary movie instead of being on the streets. Hold them to the same Halloween smartphone rules you’re following yourself: Phones should be pocketed when they are near traffic. Tell them it’s OK if they don’t answer your call or text right away—they should do so only when it’s safe. This may seem like a no-brainer (zombie pun intended!), but remind them not to go into the home or backyard of anyone they don’t know. Also, tell them to always stay with their group of friends and don’t split up. Halloween Safety for Drivers and Homeowners Halloween safety is everyone’s responsibility—not just trick-or-treaters and their parents. No one wants kids to get hurt on Halloween, and you don’t want to deal with the consequences if someone is injured by your vehicle or on your property. Here are some tips that can help keep everyone safe on the spookiest night of the year. Driving If you are driving anywhere near trick-or-treaters, slow down, turn your headlights on (even before it gets fully dark), and be extra vigilant on side streets, pulling into driveways, and even at crosswalks. Never assume those kids won’t run into the street, even if they are with their parents. And if you don’t need to drive anyplace during peak trick-or-treating hours, stay home. Your Home You want the front of your home to be as inviting as it can be for trick-or-treaters, but you also want it to be safe. For example, an orange porch light may be wonderfully eerie, but it also can make it more difficult to see as you climb stairs. Go back to a white light for a couple hours, keep your porch clear of obstacles (e.g., pumpkins should be off to the side), and keep any electrical cords off the walkway where someone could trip over them. Also, if you have any mechanical decorations that deliver jump scares, make sure they aren’t scaring anyone standing on your steps. Your Dog Some dogs are mellow when the doorbell rings dozens of times a night, and some will go nuts. Protective or agitated dogs may try sneaking out of the front door and could bite or knock down trick-or-treaters—and you could be liable for injuries. You know your pup best, but err on the side of caution: Consider keeping your dog(s) away from your front door, maybe in another room or in a crate, while you are handing out candy to trick-or-treaters. Or, set up shop outside, on your porch or driveway, so that your doorbell isn’t being constantly rung. ******************************** From all of us at Bordas & Bordas, have a safe and truly boo-tiful Halloween!

What to Do After a Truck Accident in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania

What to Do After a Truck Accident in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania A recent trucking accident on I-70 near Wheeling caused serious injuries and brought traffic to a standstill. These kinds of accidents are all too common in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, especially on major highways like I-70 and I-79. If you’re involved in a crash with a commercial truck, knowing what to do next is critical for your health and your legal rights. Protecting Yourself Legally and Medically If you’re involved in a truck accident: Call 911 immediately. Document the scene (photos, notes, witness names). Seek medical attention—even if injuries seem minor. Commercial trucking accidents are far more complicated than regular car crashes. The trucking company, driver, and even cargo loaders may all play a role in what happened. That’s why it’s so important to protect yourself early. Truck crashes often involve federal trucking regulations in addition to local laws. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) requires drivers to operate with “extreme caution” in hazardous conditions, a regulation often cited in legal cases. Don’t Navigate This Alone Trucking companies have their lawyers working to limit what they pay. Victims need someone in their corner who understands both state and federal laws across the tri-state region. An experienced attorney can help preserve evidence, negotiate with insurers, and ensure you’re treated fairly.  At Bordas & Bordas, we fight to protect victims and ensure they’re not taken advantage of during this complex process. Learn more about truck accident claims

Bordas and Bordas Attorneys celebrating 40 years of justice from 1985 to 2025 with the message "Fighting for Justice for 40 Years.

Fighting for Justice for 40 Years

Fighting for Justice for 40 Years In 2025, Bordas & Bordas is proudly celebrating 40 years, a testament to our unwavering commitment to serving our community and fighting for justice. Since our founding in 1985 by Jim and Linda Bordas, we’ve grown from a small practice into one of the region’s premier personal injury law firms with offices in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Wheeling and Moundsville, West Virginia, and St. Clairsville, Ohio. The story of Bordas & Bordas Attorneys PLLC began with a unique partnership. Linda, a former hospital pharmacist turned lawyer, and Jim, who has been described by many as a giant in the legal profession, combined their expertise and passion for justice to open the doors of Bordas & Bordas upon Linda’s graduation from law school in 1985. Their remarkable record, including never losing a trial together, fueled the firm’s early success. Linda’s medical background proved invaluable, particularly in medical malpractice cases, where she became a leading force, securing landmark verdicts and expanding patient rights. Jim spent his career fighting battles for his clients that others couldn’t or wouldn’t fight. For over four decades, he built a reputation of success through landmark jury verdicts and settlements. In 2000, the Bordas legacy continued with the addition of Jim and Linda’s oldest son, Jamie, who became the firm’s managing partner in 2005. Jim cherished working alongside Jamie, creating a strong bond, and ensuring the firm’s values would endure. Linda remains a partner at Bordas & Bordas and continues to provide guidance and advice as we continue to fight for justice. Our Core Values: The Shield of Bordas & Bordas Our logo, a shield with four quadrants and a central cross, symbolizes what we hold dear: Experience: Four decades of dedicated legal service. Family: A firm built on strong family values and lasting relationships. Community: A commitment to serving and giving back to our community. Results: A proven track record of securing substantial recoveries for our clients. Christian Values: The Cross in the center represents the moral compass that guides our work. Our Commitment to You A lot has changed in 40 years, but one thing remains the same: Our reputation for taking on any opponent in the courtroom. This is backed by years of success and record-breaking results, including numerous multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements across a wide range of personal injury practice areas. We understand the challenges clients face, which is why our cases are handled on a contingency fee basis. This means clients pay no fee unless we secure a recovery for them. We offer: Free initial consultations. No retainer required. We advance all case expenses. Our work has garnered national attention, with features on programs like 60 Minutes, Inside Edition, and CNN, showcasing our dedication to seeking justice for our clients. Learn more about our results by clicking here. As we celebrate 40 years, we reaffirm our commitment to providing exceptional legal representation and upholding the values that have guided us since 1985. We are grateful for the trust our clients have placed in us and look forward to serving our community for many years to come.